Quote:
Originally Posted by The Saint
I don't see how having real steel users comment on it is "crap".
I know of no instance of TM stating that they gave real steel shooters the opportunity to test/comment on their AEGs in a training weapon capacity. You might be thinking of something else.
|
dude they vid pics are bunch of people with Multicam AFAIK army does NOT officially use multicam, they use ACU there's one hint. Second thing is that it was just WE they did not test magna design.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aZn_triXta07
The WE design is based off the Escort system, it's more efficient.
All it needs is some solid steel internals and it'll last forever :P
|
Tanio koba design can go through 4.5 mag easily (on auto) in one fill. one guy did it on you tube
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacingManiac
Ino was too much hype, they didn't do enough work to make the internal work....
I am 75% into WOC that I am not getting out to make the purchase worthwhile. And for the most part it works. If I know then what I know now, I'd build one from scratch for WA...if I wanted to spend less, I'll go from KA or G&P bodies, if I want to spend more, I'll go with Prime.....get with G&P internals, and get RS furniture....
|
Lol I did a math and my G&P reciever broke pushing me forward with the plan, building a Magna:
M16 w/ ra-tech Burst trigger and npas bolt carrier will cost $1.5k w/ a plastic handguard as well as carrying handle
M4 w/ ra-tech npas bolt carrier, will cost $1.7k
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beowulfe
LMAO...indeed it does.
I'm going to buy an AGM.
|
Good luck fixing agm horrible problems, I would go with JG if you were into clones