Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   TM AUG High Cycle (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=147584)

Matula November 14th, 2012 08:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by Long_Bong (Post 1725435)
Wonder if the old mags will support the high rof

La seule chose que les gens ont vu sur airsoft France c'est quelques miss feed et un ration plus de l'ordre de 18/20 bb sec avec les mag standard et non 25/30 bb sec. Mais je te rassure, quand tu vois les vidéos, je crois pas que ça change beaucoup :)

Styrak November 14th, 2012 09:39

Quote:

Originally Posted by Long_Bong (Post 1725435)
Wonder if the old mags will support the high rof

The 80 round low/mids will probably support almost any rate of fire setup you could have.

Kos-Mos November 14th, 2012 14:19

Quote:

Originally Posted by Styrak (Post 1725432)
Looks like a standard AUG mag to me. Also TM would be retarded to not make it compatible, and there's no reason not to.
Also the reason it's "high cycle" isn't just gears and motor, it only shoots 250fps.

EDIT: Yup confirmed it's standard AUG mags.

I don't know... the review (with pictures) I read mentioned a different rear outer barrel and hop-up unit, along with a longer nozzle, and the feed hole in the mag was on the very front edge, barely the thickness of the plastic wall...

Styrak November 14th, 2012 14:37

Looks the same to me



TM High cycle hicap

http://www.airsoftglobal.com/shop/im...G-180-AG-1.jpg

CA hicap:

http://www.airsoftglobal.com/shop/im...P201P-AG-1.jpg

TM hicap:

http://www.airsoftglobal.com/shop/im...G-330-AG-1.jpg

TM 80 round:

http://www.airsoftglobal.com/shop/im...UG-80-AG-1.jpg

Jimski November 14th, 2012 14:55

high cycle would only need a different spring I think

Styrak November 14th, 2012 15:07

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jimski (Post 1725676)
high cycle would only need a different spring I think

Different motor, highspeed gears, possibly lower power spring.
That's already been established though.

Long_Bong November 14th, 2012 15:12

So putting a 350 spring would remove the high rof, unless going with a 9.6v i imagine

Styrak November 14th, 2012 15:20

Quote:

Originally Posted by Long_Bong (Post 1725682)
So putting a 350 spring would remove the high rof, unless going with a 9.6v i imagine

Yes, it's not some sort of TM magic. It's just physics.

Jimski November 14th, 2012 15:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Styrak (Post 1725679)
Different motor, highspeed gears, possibly lower power spring.
That's already been established though.

no I was talking about the spring in the magazine, nevermind lol

Matula November 14th, 2012 19:45

Tu vas détruire surtout ta gearbox. La majorité des pieces TM sont en plastique sauf les gear, l'anti reverse, et le spring.

You should keep it at 260fps, the fps doesn't matter anyway. It's a TM :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Long_Bong (Post 1725682)
So putting a 350 spring would remove the high rof, unless going with a 9.6v i imagine


Long_Bong November 14th, 2012 20:12

True!!

Matula November 15th, 2012 10:44

Pour les performances :) (From airsoft France)

Quote:

La taille du canon il faudrait que tu prennes contact avec tokyo marui pour savoir pourquoi ils ont pas mis un 36cm. rolleyes.gif
La portée efficace est de 40m, l'ajout d'un canon PDI 6.01 de 30.3cm Ã* fait monté la vélocité Ã* 300/305fps et 5m de plus sur la porté.

Long_Bong November 15th, 2012 14:23

Nice!!!

Long_Bong November 15th, 2012 15:00

Wonder if you can fit Phantom kit and the like

lord_sid November 15th, 2012 15:46

I dont think you can fit a phantom kit on it. The top rail is to close to the barrel and you wouldn't be able to fit a phantom kit over the barrel. Also looks like they shorten and removed the gas tube on the barrel knuckle piece. With it shorten, the phantom kits wouldn't be able to be attached.

http://www.tokyo-marui.co.jp/appimg/...0713170220.jpg


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:38.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.