Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Media (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   Kimber WARRIOR (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=66191)

ILLusion August 28th, 2008 00:26

Kimber WARRIOR
 
Those who know the background on the Kimber Warrior will know that it is a very close cousin to Tokyo Marui's new MEU SOC release of the same lineage.

If the name isn't bad ass enough, just check out the gun for yourself and come up with your own words to call it:

I finally got around to taking some pictures of the complete build (with the safety levers installed!):

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...8/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...9/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...0/original.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...625/medium.jpghttp://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...626/medium.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...624/medium.jpghttp://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...623/medium.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...622/medium.jpghttp://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...621/medium.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...7/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...1/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...3/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...4/original.jpg

http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...5/original.jpg


http://www.pbase.com/illusive_airsof...0/original.jpg

Those of you who know this pistol and its genealogy can understand and respect the subtle change I made to the grip panels. This is the real Kimber Warrior:


The background on the gun and explanation for my choice in grip panel:

Quote:

Originally Posted by http://www.sofmag.com/news/permalink1/2006/9/5/2159207335611.html
A century after the U.S. Military realized its mistake in adopting and issuing a revolver in the anemic .38 Colt caliber to replace its Colt .45 Single Action Army, it is in the process of replacing the equally ineffective 9x19mm NATO (ball). The almost unbelievable part of this history lesson is that the caliber that will replace the 9mm is exactly the same one that replaced the .38 Colt and this is the .45 ACP cartridge designed in 1905.

However, where the U.S. Military learned its lesson quickly during the Spanish American War of 1898, it took 20 years the second time around, as the 9mm was universally adopted by the services in 1986. Well, almost. A major element of the United States Marine Corps never fully adopted the 9mm pistol, retaining an unknown number of its original .45 ACP Model of 1911A1 pistols for special missions. This was the Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), later having added Special Operations Capable (SOC) to its designation.

Since 1986, MEU (SOC)’s 1911 pistol program has been an evolutionary one with the older guns not only being rebuilt as needed at Quantico, but also retrofitted with various improved features following the commercial custom 1911 business. When hundreds of like-new 1911A1 pistols were found in the magazines of decommissioned WW II ships, these guns reportedly made their way to Quantico (and elsewhere) to replenish their aging supply. Thus, the evolution of the 1911 in the USMC continues in its search for a new Close Quarter Battle (CQB) pistol. However, Quantico was only capable of rebuilding 1911A1 pistols on a relatively limited basis.

With the Nine-Eleven attack on America and the beginning of the Global War On Terrorism (GWOT), Quantico became a very busy place. Thus, when the USMC’s MEU (SOC) joined the U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM); it was allowed to do a one-time sole-source buy of new 1911A1-style .45 ACP pistols. This was the 87-operator, Detachment 1 (Det-1) at Camp Pendleton.

The pistol chosen by Det-1 was a Kimber Custom model similar to that adopted by the LAPD SWAT unit, but with additional special features specified by the Marine Corps. These included a traditional extractor, no firing pin safety, a standard recoil spring guide, ambidextrous thumb safety, lanyard loop and genuine Novak Lo- Mount Night Sights. The Kimber pistols were shipped directly to Dawson Precision in Texas where they were each fitted with the Dawson Rail in order to mount a proprietary SureFire Weapon Light designed especially for the Military.

When Dawson delivered the pistols equipped with its rail and special SureFire lights to Det-1, each was then fitted with a set of coyote brown Simonich Gunner Grips from Strider Knives. A unique Safariland 6400-style [sic] desert camouflage holster was also issued with each Kimber, and held the gun with the special SureFire light mounted. Also issued with each pistol were a unique Strider Det-1 knife and a quick-release lanyard from Gemtech. Since Quantico was (and still is) testing and fielding various 1911-type pistols through MEU (SOC), the USMC Kimber’s official designation was the Interim Close Quarter Battle (ICQB) Pistol, and the kit went with Det-1 on its six-month active duty tour in Iraq.

The Warrior

In the wake of the success of Kimber’s USMC ICQB pistol, the company introduced a commercial variation with a number of features originally specified by the USMC for its pistol. These included Genuine Novak Lo- Mount Sights, a match grade barrel and bushing, a standard recoil spring guide rod, a traditional extractor, a lanyard loop, checkered mainspring housing and other custom-grade features standard on all Kimber 1911’s. While the front strap is not checkered on the commercial version, the pistol comes with Kimber’s firing pin safety system.

Called the Warrior, the new pistol also comes with a few features not found on the USMC pistol. The finish is KimPro, the hardest thermally cured finish available, in this case, matte black. The grips of the Warrior, while somewhat similar to the USMC’s original “Gunner” grips are of Kimber’s own design, and are also in Kimber’s version of coyote brown color. Equally noticeable is the absence of the Dawson rail, which has been replaced by Kimber’s integral M1913-style frame rail. By the way, this is a genuine MilStd rail, not just a look-alike. As with Kimber’s other 1911 pistols, the Warrior is built to match grade specifications and produces tight groups and total reliability, as tested.

Because the Kimber Warrior comes with Kimber’s integral frame rail, it will accept virtually all M1913-style tactical weapon lights such as those from Insight Technology and SureFire, including SureFire’s recent addition, the X200. However, the Warrior will not accept the special SureFire light designed for the Dawson Rail, and the special light-mount holster made for Det-1 by Safariland will not satisfactorily accept the Warrior with any of the newer, smaller lights mounted.

The Desert Warrior

On the heels of the success of the Warrior, Kimber introduced a sister pistol called the Desert Warrior, in 2006. Inspired by America’s involvement in the Global War On Terrorism and more specifically the USMC’s success with the Det-1 pistol during its deployment in the Middle East, the Desert Warrior is identical to the initial Kimber Warrior with the following exceptions:

On the Desert Warrior are sights resembling Novak Sights, but which are of Kimber’s own design. As with a similar rear sight used by another company, the Kimber Rear Sight incorporates vertical grooves on both sides. Apparently included as styling, these grooves serve no practical purpose. The other difference in the Desert Warrior is its KimPro finish. Instead of being a matte black as on the Warrior, the KimPro finish on the Desert Warrior is the same tough synthetic coating but in coyote brown…Well, almost. Some external parts have been been left in matte black. These include the sights, thumb safeties, slide stop, magazine release and base, trigger and stainless steel barrel. Even so, the coyote brown finish in effect renders the pistol more difficult to detect in an environment where this color blends well.

Like the Kimber Warrior, the Desert Warrior will accept all of the newer, smaller tactical weapon lights on its M1913 framerail, but as this is written all of these lights come only in black. Until someone offers such a light in a color close to coyote brown, the only way to match a light to the pistol will be by painting the light housing a color as close as possible to coyote brown. Holsters to accommodate the Warrior with or without a light mounted should be available from several companies in the near future, including Bianchi and Blackhawk.

So to sum up, for those who can recognize the grips, those are coyote brown Simonich Gunner Grips from Strider Knives - the same grip panels used on the ICQB.

Matching Gemtech TRL is present, and 6004 Safariland holster for Kimber Warrior w/ light mounted is here. Haven't had time to take pictures of the pistol with the holster. I was tempted to go with the 3-colour desert to match the original Det-1 release but decided to stick with coyote brown. Hope you enjoyed the pix.

Dusti69 August 28th, 2008 00:42

the grips look like corn cobs

Thorazine August 28th, 2008 00:43

Thing of beauty. Needless to say, DO WANT. I love Kimber 1911's.

mcguyver August 28th, 2008 00:45

The Kimber Warrior is on my list of "to have" guns. They're tough (I've seen some that guys put tens of thousands of rounds through), and they're still going (but obviously worn).

The real one probably isn't a whole lot more than building a quality airsoft version, eh? ;)

airborne1 August 28th, 2008 00:48

Nice Brian I have the Desert Kimber and love it. Any idea were to get mags for these things?

ILLusion August 28th, 2008 00:54

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcguyver (Post 805442)
The real one probably isn't a whole lot more than building a quality airsoft version, eh? ;)

Sadly, that's the truth. lol.

R1Style August 28th, 2008 01:11

very nice piece.
I was actually looking at getting a real Kimber (non airsoft) pistol.

Shirley August 28th, 2008 01:12

pure sexy! hot grips!

mcguyver August 28th, 2008 01:15

I've handled (but not shot) the real one. The grips are OK, and seem like they'd be helpful for us small-handed folk.

bean August 28th, 2008 01:24

The missing part have to do with the hole by the beaver tail?

Lakonian August 28th, 2008 01:40

Uhm..... So.... Brian, is this your 340th 1911/2011... ??

You're a bastard... :p Wait till my 1911/2011 hybrid thing is done. Then I'll laugh at you.... :)

ILLusion August 28th, 2008 02:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by bean (Post 805469)
The missing part have to do with the hole by the beaver tail?

Yup. The ambidextrous safety levers aren't there (yet.)

The trigger will also be changed at the same time. The one that's currently installed is close, but it's not totally correct.

attack-beaver August 28th, 2008 03:27

i see no difference in the trigger you have on the gun right know. how are the two different.

ILLusion August 28th, 2008 04:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by attack-beaver (Post 805521)
i see no difference in the trigger you have on the gun right know. how are the two different.

The lack of a backslop adjustment screw and serrations on the contact surface (both difficult or impossible to see in the given photos.)

Also, the holes on the trigger I'm currently using are a bit too big.

But besides that, it's a well built quality trigger. Just not exactly what I was looking for - it was the only thing I could find at the time I bought it.

Shirley August 28th, 2008 04:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILLusion (Post 805544)
The lack of a backslop adjustment screw and serrations on the contact surface (both difficult or impossible to see in the given photos.)

Also, the holes on the trigger I'm currently using are a bit too big.

But besides that, it's a well built quality trigger. Just not exactly what I was looking for - it was the only thing I could find at the time I bought it.

Money for you is like toilet paper. :(

Yannos August 28th, 2008 04:43

Wow! It looks very very good, Do Want!

RacingManiac August 28th, 2008 07:26

Nova kit?

How are you planning to modify your mag bumper? Just reshaping it with file and sandpaper or what? Have you taken the mag apart yet to see if its just a big piece of ABS plastic?

BTW I'd try to get the Kimber Chamber and barrel from SD(I think they make them right?). The aluminum ones that comes with Nova looks nice for like 2 slide cycle, and they get beatup really quickly. Though the SD one will be tougher to fit....

Nice gun, can't wait to see it done.

Brakoo August 28th, 2008 09:20

Freaking nice build right there Illusion, I love the chocie of grips. I got the same exact one for my 1911 and they're freaking amazing.

ex August 28th, 2008 09:38

Awesome...Just Awesome!!

safx August 28th, 2008 11:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by kos (Post 805481)
Uhm..... So.... Brian, is this your 340th 1911/2011... ??

You're a bastard... :p Wait till my 1911/2011 hybrid thing is done. Then I'll laugh at you.... :)


When will that be 2011?

And you'll have to get off your chair.

Snap.

ILLusion August 28th, 2008 12:42

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac (Post 805586)
Nova kit?

Yup, all Nova, even all the controls. I tried using the Tanio Koba kit as well as the stock controls for it, but they were either very tight fitting and/or needed fairly heavy modifications in order to fit. The Nova controls all drop right in and operate very very smooth. Those bastards must have done that on purpose just to force you to buy all their parts. Either that or the dimensions are all closer to real steel, which makes the Marui out of spec. Only way to find out is to get some real steel controls... pwuahahaha.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac (Post 805586)
How are you planning to modify your mag bumper? Just reshaping it with file and sandpaper or what? Have you taken the mag apart yet to see if its just a big piece of ABS plastic?

First thing I did when I got the mags was to take the bumper apart to see if it can be modified, and it looks like it's possible. It's just a big chunk of hard rubber. It has a semi-gloss texture to it, so I'll see what i can do to modify it without losing too much of the finish.

Quote:

Originally Posted by RacingManiac (Post 805586)
BTW I'd try to get the Kimber Chamber and barrel from SD(I think they make them right?). The aluminum ones that comes with Nova looks nice for like 2 slide cycle, and they get beatup really quickly. Though the SD one will be tougher to fit....

I know there's Shooters Design Kimber chambers for the Hi-Capa, but I don't know if it will fit on to the threads of the 1911 barrel. I have another photo set I'm putting up of a Kimber Hi-Capa that has the Kimber chamber and straight outer barrel.
The aluminum Nova chamber/barrel does get scratched up pretty good, but they register really really well with the slide. The sound of this slide operating sounds like sex butter.
I thought about going with the SD one as well, but the idea of the steel mashing the Nova slide to pieces didn't sit well with me - I decided to just stick with the Nova one for now, since it does seem to be operating nicely.

The downside of this build is the weight - or lack thereof. The SD steel barrel & chamber would add some weight to the all aluminum body. The grip panels also don't have the hollow to accept the weights that come with the Marui 1911, so this gun is probably lighter (if not the same weight) as the stock gun.

RacingManiac August 28th, 2008 12:53

I find mine weighs a decent bit, probably because I also have the full length recoil rod and comp kit on mine. The Kimber chamber thread I'd imagine is the same as the Hi-capa thread, so you need to get Hi-Capa 5.1 straight barrel for that if you want to go that route. The barrel and the slide fit is OK with the SD parts. No where near as hard to mess with than the BBU and the frame thing that comes with my Nova kit. The nicest thing IMO on the whole Nova kit thing is that the "clunk" you get when cycling the slide. The fit is much less sloppy than my Hi-Capa. I also have all Nova controls minus the trigger and mag release(Nine-Ball and Stock). They are nice, but for mine they are slightly different color than their MBK, I wonder if I should've just gotten the stainless ones instead. The Ambi-safety has a bit of slop to it that I don't like, but it functions and looks good. Though I think mine was actually the wrong one for a SFA gun(mine was I think Kimber style).

One thing of note, the SD outer barrel is slightly bigger OD(probably less than 3 thou) than the stock or the Nova barrel, I had trouble using it with the PDI comp kit, I had to turn that down a bit to fit, which obviously made the finish in that portion uneven compare to the rest....

the_griffinator August 28th, 2008 20:07

Gaah...I love it. I was considering a Kimber build for my next project.

ILLusion September 23rd, 2009 18:11

I finally got around to taking some pictures of the complete build (with the safety levers installed!):


Conker September 23rd, 2009 18:21

I hate you. Teasing is so wrong.


...

But that gun, however, is pure sex. :D

lokisama September 23rd, 2009 18:36

I recently got the nova warrior kit too. Beautiful piece of kit.
I've encountered some problems that you might be familiar with. First of all mine is MEU based..

How did you go about modifying the rear plate on the slide. [I just omitted this piece]
Did you have issues fitting the stock trigger and mag catch? [I had to file them both]
Lastly what was your workaround to getting the BBU installed? Mine sat too low. Had to remove a little nub on the rear sight. [im using hicapa 5.1 BBU on it]
Stock MEU safety leavers won't install. [currently only has the left side installed]
Grip screws are too tight on bushings.
Front sight is too loose. It won't stay on.

Danke September 23rd, 2009 18:38

It's nearly enough to turn me to the dark side!

ILLusion September 23rd, 2009 18:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokisama (Post 1071037)
I recently got the nova warrior kit too. Beautiful piece of kit.
I've encountered some problems that you might be familiar with. First of all mine is MEU based..

Mine was M1911A1 based

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokisama (Post 1071037)
How did you go about modifying the rear plate on the slide. [I just omitted this piece]

I didn't have to. It fit just fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokisama (Post 1071037)
Did you have issues fitting the stock trigger and mag catch? [I had to file them both]

No idea. I didn't use the stock trigger and mag catch. I used all Nova components where possible.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokisama (Post 1071037)
Lastly what was your workaround to getting the BBU installed? Mine sat too low. Had to remove a little nub on the rear sight. [im using hicapa 5.1 BBU on it]

No workaround required. My BBU dropped right in. I think I may have had to file the "legs" of the BBu a bit, but nothing major enough for me to remember.

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokisama (Post 1071037)
Front sight is too loose. It won't stay on.

The front sight that came with my Nova kit fit perfectly. Very secure.

BadMrFrosty September 23rd, 2009 19:33

That looks perfect. Excellent work once again.

The Journeyman September 24th, 2009 16:33

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokisama (Post 1071037)
Front sight is too loose. It won't stay on.

You might have found a way to work around this but I had the same problem and dealt with it thus:

I put layers of tape under the front sight's dovetail base and kept adding until it would fit snugly and wouldn't move left or right.

ILLusion September 24th, 2009 16:51

That's what I do as well. If I want an extra tight fit, I'll actually put the slide and sight (with tape attached) in to the freezer (or even on my balcony if it's a frigid winter day) for about 30 minutes before attaching the parts. The cold weather will very slightly shrink all of the components - just small enough so that it will all slide together, and as it comes back to room temperature, the components will expand back in to each other, creating a very tough and solid hold.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.