Airsoft Canada

Airsoft Canada (https://airsoftcanada.com/forums.php)
-   Airsoft Guns Discussion (https://airsoftcanada.com/forumdisplay.php?f=53)
-   -   CA36 or CA36K (https://airsoftcanada.com/showthread.php?t=22075)

ogrik March 21st, 2006 06:52

CA36 or CA36K
 
Hi everybody,
could you please help with selection between these two guns CA36 and CA36K?
If there is any different in performance (15 cm in barrel length).
I dont know if barrel length involves final fps, if it is possible to reach the same performance for example in 50 meters with both guns or if it differs (how much)...
I have to note, that I will upgrade it to M120, NBU set, accurate barrel.
Thank you for your answer/opinion especialy for your help.

Mira
Czech Republic

BC_K March 21st, 2006 07:35

The longer barrel will result in slightly greater accuracy & range, thats about it.

But as a stock gun, you wont really notice much difference in performance/ect until you start swapping parts.

six4 March 21st, 2006 08:28

classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.

Dozer_01 March 21st, 2006 11:04

Quote:

Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.

1 word- Cocaine? :smack:

SHaKaL March 21st, 2006 11:14

Quote:

Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.

I own a CA36K and its a great gun. No problems at all. The gun shoot 320 fps out of the box. The gun is very solid and all upgrade parts a readily available, everything that fit a TM will fit the CA, even the TM g36c upper rail (handle) fit the gun (i installed one for CQB).

So please dont talk with your ass...

swatt13 March 21st, 2006 12:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dozer_01
Quote:

Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.

1 word- Cocaine? :smack:

agreed. that was the biggest load ive ever heard.
longer barrel = better range 30-50 more fps (at best) as BC_k already said. k has the rds already integrated into the carry handle which is nice, but a little bulky for cqb use, the other is a versatile platform to build on, nice and compact, its up to you both are great guns (actually the same gun but different clothes on) where are you going to be playing most indoors or out? how much customizing to plan on doing (externally).

The Saint March 21st, 2006 13:08

Quote:

Originally Posted by SHaKaL
The gun shoot 320 fps out of the box.

Just for comparison, my CA36 shoots in the 320s on 0.25g BBs. I'd still recommend the K over the nil, though, the nil is rather clumsy.

SHaKaL March 21st, 2006 13:44

My hop up wasnt properly set when i chrono'ed it so maybe it shoot as hard as your'e
(same gun different style). Will rechrono it next game

The Saint March 21st, 2006 13:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by SHaKaL
My hop up wasnt properly set when i chrono'ed it so maybe it shoot as hard as your'e
(same gun different style). Will rechrono it next game

Oh no, I was merely suggesting the amount of FPS difference between the K and the nil as a result of different barrel lengths by comparing your figures with mine.

Rumpel Felt March 21st, 2006 16:26

Quote:

Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.

Wow, it's like wasted hobo teaching calculus.

I'll give him this at least he read....something. And that something would be the now horribly inncorrect and stupid "CA bashing thread" which should be removed.

Your biggest mistake is NOT buying the CA model if they make it. TM is what will waste all your money, not CA.

The advice given to new people is not so much help when all it is "buy TM" (all though it's that persons fault for not researching) as it is TM fanboyism in which that all they've known and havn't actually tried CA and found out what they have been missing.

Anyway, I found that a rifle sized gun feels wierd with a folding stock. Also, the longer front end may get a harsher beating if you run around alot. A more compact carry and a quicker draw ability may be a good reason to go K or moreso, C, even though you didn't mention it.

CARL March 21st, 2006 16:35

I own the CA G36 C it works well in all circumstances go with the CA besides most parts are compatible with the TM parts and if you do break it just order new parts, big deal. The G36 K would be nice to own two its right in between and the best of both worlds.

nic_s March 24th, 2006 19:02

Ahha, very informative thread here. I'm thinking about a K for myself, but my only concern was the inconsistent grease application from the factury. Have they solved this problem?

SHaKaL March 24th, 2006 19:03

Yes its called, opening the mechbox and grease it ourselves.

SockMonkey March 24th, 2006 19:40

Not every one is capable of "just opening the mechbox" I picked my self up a CA249 and while its a different box and all it looks pretty bombproof. The "TM fanboyisms" come from the fact that TM has a far better quality control than any of the other companies out there. Look at the early CA Mp5's.... Run and hide! from that I can see and heard CA has come along way and I personaly wouldnt hesitate buying a G36 in fact im considering it for my next loadout.

Droc March 24th, 2006 22:34

Quote:

Originally Posted by six4
classic army would be a good brand to steer clear of,other than price i see no point in spending the money on ca weapons if/when it fails hard to find parts for,and not many people will work on ca stuff.go ahead and spend your money on this sport we all love,,,,just do it right and only spend it once..do yourself a favor and save your money for now.


haha
your 4 posts sure shows what you know...


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.