all boxed in
 

Got A m15a4 CQB should I get a box mag,


do they=fun or are they lamo?

cool, if they belong but will probs destroy your mechbox.

I have one..

It's okay, havent destroyed my mechbox yet.

Box mags look stupid if they aren't on actual LMGs...

+1

Stick to STANAG types.

ya get a Cmag i getting one for my JG M4 auto winder = expensive

or you can save you money and get 12 (+/-) X 68 rd mags and leave the support gunning for the guys with LMG's.

The version2 gearbox has a couple of structural flaws in it. After some pounding they crack and need replacing. Its a headache that leaves you gunless for games.

Plus with the low cap mags, you can go to any Milsim with lots of ammo.

Most prairie MILSIM games have ammo regulations.

1X highcap

3X midcaps

unlimited low caps.

Just my $0.02, but if thats the look or it helps with your style of play, then really their is nothing anyone here can say to change you mind.

I also think they look stupid. Except if it has a Shrike conversion upper on it, then it looks okayish...

I wouldn't prefer a box mag.'

@#$%Just Buy a lot of hi-caps!!!@#$%

A c mag looks good and not so bulky.

http://www.kapowwe.com/Merchant2/mer...=&Store_Code=R

box mags are way to big on it

box mags have nothing to do with your mechbox. it's plain use that will cause failure and you can say that about any gun.
i ran an electric winding cmag at a few games, it's really fun. plus they actually exist if you're worried about realism.
YouTube - Noveske Rifleworks - N4 10.5" CQB, 300 rd dump

+2

Notice every noob that comes in here asks about either box mags or sniping?

I blame video games.


...and hip hop.

If you like it,go for it.It's all in what you want on your unit! It's a Personal thing as to how you want it to look.The more rnd's you put through your unit causes more wear & tear,simple as that,but thats just me!

Thats exactly the type of comments i spoke of in the other thread >.<