|
No I do believe this is as much about the law as anything since thats the centre of this whole debate.
The issue with this whole thing is the misconceptions arisen from lack of knowledge by the general public. Im not excluding or pontificating myself here or anything so I may very well be wrong, but I just enjoy a good solid debate.
Your Section 96 doesn't apply to airsoft since its still not exactly defined that airsoft is a Replica Weapon. The definition is that it does not fire projectiles which airsoft do. That and "some airsoft guns" is the term used. What is "some" airsoft supposed to mean? As opposed to what? What difference does the law see in airsoft enough to not generalize the definition?
__________________
My trust is in whiskey, in weed and in Slayer, its GODDAMN ELECTRIC - Pantera
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pliskin
This is the equivalent to knocking on deaths door and blowing his head off with a shotgun.
|
|