Quote:
Originally Posted by mcguyver
Over-react much?
Sounds like lots of theory and math trumping real-world use.
I'll stick to real-world use, and leave the eggheads to scratch themselves bald.
|
Says the guy whose avatar is a bald man with an egg-sized head.
With that said, "real-world use" means very little. Building and shaping impact resistant polymers is a science, that requires theory and math.
People don't say "yeah, these building codes in Canada sound like a lot of engineering theory and math trumping the real-world use of the structures in Haiti".
Similarly, people don't say "this material in my glasses that was created by my chemists, and crafted by my engineers, is pretty strong I guess. People have been using them in 3j airsoft events for years now. I know that we didn't test it for that, but I'm still going to guarantee that they will hold up to 3j anyway".
Saying "I'm not concerned. They've held up so far, and I trust my eyes to these glasses" is one thing.
But dismissing it as though anecdotal evidence is on par with "theory and math" conveys what your actually mean quite poorly.