February 23rd, 2006, 17:38
|
#43
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Abbotsford, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stokes
A couple weeks ago I did a hell of alot of research for a M4a1 CQB purchase. It all came down two 3 companies: CA, G&P, and TM. I spent tireless hours on the net especially on Arnies and ASC to find reviews and the ups and downs that these companies have upon using their guns. Here is what I have to offer:
1-TM: although it is said to be reliable... it is just plastic. No one wants to play a sport dedicated to simulating the military with a plastic gun (only if your rich and would spend another few hundred dollars for a metal body). So TM was off the list.
2-G&P or CA: These two manufacturers were the remaining finalists on my quest to buying a CQB m4a1. Although G&P is said to have top quality parts and a REALISTIC outer image, it is just to damn hot out of the box + suppliers in Canada either didnt have it or was selling it at a ridiculous price.
3- It all came down to CA the final contender. After reviewing countless remarks from others who have handled and owned this weapon. I was impressed. Although CA has made crappy guns in the pass, just as skippy and Rumpel felt stated they have "kicked up their game". The guns that are being manufactured and produced at CA are not the same guns that was made a couple years ago. These have been refined they are more solid than before and shoots damn well out of the box. Who can buy a TM now that other manufacturers are doing what TM can never do? Provide us "milsimers" with a toy that closer resembles the actual thing then TM can ever make.
And so I went forth to purchase the CA m15a4 CQB from XE.
Therefor Guys and Gals CA has taken my trust (even more when i recieve the gun). This is only a point of view from a person who has done countless hours of research and this is the conclusion that I came up with. So please dont flame me.
|
Same deal here, but I ended up with a CA33E just to be different.
|
|
|