Airsoft Canada - View Single Post

Dracheous · January 4th, 2007, 20:13

I'm guessing that the V.2 over the V.3 option being due to the handle and it being unable to hold the motor cage. That's just a visual opinion from me on why they went V.2 over V.3.

Another possibility is the fact that MOST of their guns use the V.2 box anyway. So stick to what they know and deal with. All their parts are V.2 oriented as well so why make production lines change up?

Personally, I'd put up with a V.2 from G&P. I have one in my Bushmaster and the things awesome. And the best part is that replacement parts are more readily avail for the V.2 mechbox. So break downs are easily fixed in my opinion. Although I'm told the M249's out there strip gears CONSTANTLY so I wonder how this 249 is on gears.

January 4th, 2007, 20:13	#21
Dracheous Lego Head Trader rating Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Gatineau, that's right I'm in QUEBEC!	I'm guessing that the V.2 over the V.3 option being due to the handle and it being unable to hold the motor cage. That's just a visual opinion from me on why they went V.2 over V.3. Another possibility is the fact that MOST of their guns use the V.2 box anyway. So stick to what they know and deal with. All their parts are V.2 oriented as well so why make production lines change up? Personally, I'd put up with a V.2 from G&P. I have one in my Bushmaster and the things awesome. And the best part is that replacement parts are more readily avail for the V.2 mechbox. So break downs are easily fixed in my opinion. Although I'm told the M249's out there strip gears CONSTANTLY so I wonder how this 249 is on gears. __________________ _________________________________ "The hydrogen economy car from the people who brought you the 'Hindenburg'" - Glen Foster Condoms do not guarantee safe sex any more. A friend of mine wore one and was shot by the woman's husband!