Quote:
Originally Posted by Foofighter
As I understand it when it comes to things like the flak vests if you get shot wearing your own (one that wasn't issued) the military wont be responsible. Also another con of using your own kit is when it breaks it's up to you to replace it out of your own pocket. When something that is issued breaks they just give you a new one.
|
That's an American thing, they don't cover their troops' injuries with pensions and such if they get hurt wearing non issued kit. It's different in Canada. It's not encouraged to buy your own kit, but many folks do. If I were going overseas you can bet your ass there'd be a few items with me that weren't issued. Yes, you pay for repair or replacement out of pocket, but as you mention "they just give you a new one" doesn't always happen. Supply is often out of a given item, especially if it's in a popular size. I have no problem investing in and replacing superior kit if it keeps me happy, comfy and working well.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kos
For weapon accessories, don't you have to talk to the armourer about what's okay, and what isn't? (forgive the ignorance)..
|
Depends on the accessory. If it's something external and doesn't impede the workings of the gun, it's (generally) ok. You can't go installing a lightened bolt or something like that though. Scopes, lights, grips are usually fine as long as they're within reason. As said above it all depends on the upper management of your unit.