Airsoft Canada - View Single Post

Maverick0 · April 10th, 2008, 16:55

Ok, plain and simple then. What takes more effort? Tuning a gun down, or not complaining?

Hmm, let's see:

Tuning a gun down has been broken down into not only a time consuming operation, but a financial consideration.

Not complaning costs nothing and hurts no one. Specially in this case.

Safety being the number one concern, 350 full auto is not unsafe as pointed out by several people, even with examples given from businesses that are still in operation after many years of operating at this limit.

Honestly though, I think this thread is about done. A majority have voted for 350 while others have expressed their concerns. Now it's up to Al to decide what to do with this information.

If it were up to me, I would base the decision on business. What limit will draw the most clients without pushing away too many others? Looks like 350 to me. Anyways, I'm out. This has been talked to death now.

April 10th, 2008, 16:55	#38
Maverick0 Trader rating Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Winnipeg	Ok, plain and simple then. What takes more effort? Tuning a gun down, or not complaining? Hmm, let's see: Tuning a gun down has been broken down into not only a time consuming operation, but a financial consideration. Not complaning costs nothing and hurts no one. Specially in this case. Safety being the number one concern, 350 full auto is not unsafe as pointed out by several people, even with examples given from businesses that are still in operation after many years of operating at this limit. Honestly though, I think this thread is about done. A majority have voted for 350 while others have expressed their concerns. Now it's up to Al to decide what to do with this information. If it were up to me, I would base the decision on business. What limit will draw the most clients without pushing away too many others? Looks like 350 to me. Anyways, I'm out. This has been talked to death now. Last edited by Maverick0; April 10th, 2008 at 17:04..