View Single Post
Old November 8th, 2008, 14:30   #116
Auhydride
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Istanbul
Send a message via ICQ to Auhydride Send a message via MSN to Auhydride
Oh but you mentioned about so many stuff that was discussed hehe

Quote:
Preciously, these rounds would need something more like the Tanio-Kobia twist inner barrel to get a rolling spin rather than a back spin.
Kits will come with a rifled barrel, made by us.

Quote:
One. A pointed round is going to penitrate deeper into its target, this will mean increased MED's so that people don't have a "sniper bullet" sticking out their skin.
Rounds aren't pointed, you can see them here.


Quote:
Two. Magazines will have to be redesigned, adding to cost of the set up.
Designing isn't a real problem since this is my job, the original magazines for vsr-10 was about 20$, our magazines won't be too over that.

Quote:
Three. Hop ups will have to be turned off so not to create back spin.
Again, our barrels won't have a hop-up, instead their end will be shaped like a hop-up since hop-ups prevent the barrel from wobbling inside the hop-up mechanism (which will be only used to hold the barrel in it's old place).


Quote:
Five. Could possibly create another huge muck at the Chrony, already sniper rifles have some issue being "controlled" because of the allowances to higher FPS. Add in that this is a new round that operates on different principals and designs that could really add to trouble finding the rifle FPS limits for different fields and so on.
It's not the FPS that gets limited, it's the energy levels, with a really small calculation, the limit for a 0.4g bullet can be set, without needing to fire a 0.2g bullet. Sure the bullet's design effects the damage on the target, but teflon is a soft plastic (much much softer than the regular BBs) so it will defom on impact, this won't mean anything on your skin though, it will hurt the same, but goggles will be safe. So as long as the energy output of the barrel is controlled, you should be okay.
Auhydride is offline   Reply With Quote